trechos

Daqui em diante vou postar trechos breves, indicações formais – formale Anzeichen – de passagens que favoreçam a trajetória que estou tentando desenvolver em minha tese. O trecho seguinte, embora não mencione nominalmente Blanchot, obviamente lhe diz respeito.

De Phenomenology World-Wide, de Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, pg. 462:

” From the start Derrida was critical of Heidegger´s thought on being, strongly recalling that the (metaphysical) opposition between the original and the derivative is only displaced in Heidegger. Once again, it is the thought of presence that occurs in Heidegger´s antagonism between the proper (eigen) and the improper, ‘propriation’ (Ereignis) and ‘dis-propriation’ (Enteignis), ‘authenticity’ (Eigentlichkeit) and inauthenticity, ‘appropriation’ (Zueignung, Aneignung) and forgetting, etc.  ‘ Heidegger´s problematic’, Derrida says, ‘is the most profound’ and ‘powerful’ defense of what I am trying to query, under the title of thought of presence (Positions). Even in its heideggerian form, this antagonism indicates at first, one might say, the necessity of returning to a purity of origin, of a Schritt zurück or an Aufhebung towards the ‘thing itself’ in its pure immediate presence. In this sense it must be replaced by the irreducibility of the difference between the ideal and the real, by the necessary interlacing of presence and non-presence. The absolute and original presence to self in the transcendental experience is never pure. Necessarily, it always reveals itself as already contaminated by non-presence, non-life, by an inalienable non-originalness. “

~ por espectral em Quinta-feira, Janeiro 8, 2009.